|
|
|
|
The domain of a deity may also include more
than one aspect. Such domains are known as complex domains. A deity
with a complex domain might be the god of fire, evil, and the desert, for example.
Such a domain could include the aspect of the elemental force of fire, the aspect of the
concept of evil, and the aspect of the desert (climate/terrain type/location).
Alternately, that combination of domain aspects might imply limitations on each aspect -
only the destructive aspect of fire, for example, matching the concept of evil, and only
the heat and burning aspects of the desert, matching the elemental force of fire.
Many Geozan deities possess complex domains, and various combinations of concepts will be
defined for each. |
|
|
|
|
|
Domains are important because they help
define the relative power each deific Origin has in a specific situation or circumstance.
A deity whose domain is "god of the Ululu" would have increased power
whenever that deity wanted to affect any or all of the Ululu, or to influence anything affecting
any or all of the Ululu. Similarly, a god of storms would have reduced power
whenever that deity wanted to affect a tree growing in a calm glade (assuming that no
other domain aspects apply). Domains can overlap. Consider a situation where
an adept of a god of storms is contesting with an adept of a god of the sky. If one
were attempting to summon lightning bolts out of the clouds, and the other was attempting
to stop him, the domains of both deities would apply. Conversely, it is possible
that neither domain would apply, as would be the case if the above-mentioned adepts
attempted to heal an injured man. |
|
|
|
|
|
Whether or not, and to what extent a deity's
domain applies in a given situation is known as domain
relevance. Domain relevance to any given situation can be expressed by a
value from one to ten, with one being no relevance at all, and ten indicating a situation
that is wholly within the domain of the deity. Note that domain relevance is a
temporary and changing value, based on each situation. In general, deific followers
will be most familiar with effects that are within the domain of their deity.
Effects that fall outside that domain will usually be unfamiliar, as well as being harder
to accomplish. |
|
|
|
|
|
One important component to domain relevance
is the relative number of the deity's followers in that area. Followers of a deity
will experience generally lower domain relevance in areas where few followers of that
deity live, even in situations where that deity's domain is clearly relevant. This
fact provides a pragmatic motive for proselytizing, even for religions that would not
ordinarily have a philosophical motive for doing so. |
|
|
|
|
|
Domain relevance may also differ, even in the
same circumstances, between domain relevance for the purpose of accessing Omnessence, and
domain relevance for the purpose of using that Omnessence. Using the example of the
deity of the storm, an adept who was attempting to heal an injured man during a rainstorm
would be able to access the deity's Omnessence with a high domain relevance (he's in the
middle of a storm), but would be more limited in using that Omnessence to heal the man
(that activity isn't specifically within the domain of the deity). Conversely, it
might take that same adept longer to access Omnessence on a calm, sunny day (low domain
relevance), but once accessed, if he wanted to call up a storm, the domain relevance for
that action would be high. |
|
|
|
|
|
In situations where two or more deities (or
their followers, more specifically) are working at cross-purposes (as in the example with
the lightning bolts mentioned above), there are three general possibilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
1) Both (or all) deities have a high domain
relevance for that situation. In the case of the deities of storm and sky mentioned
above, both would have a high domain relevance, although the deity of storms might be
considered to have a slight edge in that regard. Such situations can be extremely
chaotic and potentially destructive, as each deity is working from a position of strength,
and neither deity will be able to easily overcome the other. |
|
|
|
|
|
2) One (or more than one, but not all) deity
has a high domain relevance, and the other has a low domain relevance. In this kind
of situation, the deity with the higher relevance will almost always prevail, and the
followers of the other deity or deities will have much less ability to affect the
situation in any significant way. |
|
|
|
|
|
3) Both (or all) deities have low domain
relevance. In the case of the deities of sky and storm attempting to heal an injured
man, neither would have much relevance (assuming no other domain aspects applied).
In such circumstances, deities and their followers will have difficulty affecting the
situation at all, and any attempt to work at cross-purposes would likely cause both
efforts to fail. |
|
|
|
|
|
Domain relevance is an important component
for all deific Origins. It may be referenced in several areas of the Origin
profiles, including Access, Preparation, and Casting Difficulty. Adepts who access a
deific Origin will need to consider the ideals and symbolic elements of their religion or
creed before attempting effects using that Origin. |
|
|
|
|